Qualifications: What training, experience and characteristics qualify you for this position?
ETHICS: How will you ensure your rulings remain impartial and free from both political pressure and the interests of your campaign donors?
William Demond
14 years litigating constitutional rights (including recognition as a Super Lawyer), two years as a staff attorney to a court of appeals, dozens of appointments, and teaching law to lawyers yearly.
Appellate opinions usually contain a researched explanation that is developed with the assistance of staff attorneys and approved by at least two justices. These opinions are recorded and available for public scrutiny. My website has exemplars of my steadfast dedication to protecting the People's rights and I will not sacrifice my reputation to protect special interests.
PHILOSOPHY: What is your judicial philosophy?
Living constitutionalism supplemented by textualism (particularly outside of the constitutional context) and broad constructionism (particularly when interpreting ambiguities).
ISSUES: What do you see as the most pressing challenge facing the courts today, and how would you propose addressing it?
Partisan uniformity (at least with respect to Texas' appellate courts). I propose addressing it by being elected and continuing my longstanding practice of acquiring and training interns from diverse backgrounds.
New Paragraph
